MOT MUST STAY ANNUAL, SAYS ROADSAFE

RoadSafe is urging transport minister Mike Penning to maintain the MoT test as an annual check-up for vehicles.

In 2008, the Department for Transport said the MoT failure rate was high, at 35 per cent. Between 2009 and 10, the failure rate continued its steady increase to 37 per cent. Despite this, the DfT is looking into reducing the required frequency of tests to fall in line with Europe.

In the UK, vehicles must have their first test within three years of registration, and annual tests thereafter. As a minimum, EU law requires vehicles to have their first test when they are four years old and subsequent tests every two years.

Most European countries follow the EU minimum requirement and there is pressure on the UK to do the same. RoadSafe is warning that this will lead to more crashes, caused by poorly maintained vehicles.

Testers in the UK identify 8.5 million cars with defects every year. In its own review of the MoT in 2008, the DfT said reducing the test’s frequency would significantly increase the number of unroadworthy cars and casualties.

Vehicle owners are expected to service their vehicles between tests, but there is evidence that many drivers fail to. The Tyre Industry Federation says 12 per cent of tyres are illegal on replacement, and this number is increasing as the economic downturn continues.

RoadSafe director, Adrian Walsh says: “An annual MoT is vital for picking up tyre problems. RoadSafe joins the Tyre Industry Federation, and other campaigners, with a warning to government, that extending the period between MoT tests will put lives at risk.”

One argument for increasing the time before a vehicle’s first Mo, and reducing the frequency of subsequent tests, is that modern vehicles are far more reliable. RoadSafe shares the view that newer vehicles are usually more dependable, but warns that this is a completely separate issue from the MoT.

Commercial vehicles can clock up to 300,000 miles in their first three years on the road. In this time, they see significant wear, which can lead to higher failure rates for some vehicle groups casualties.

More from 4x4 magazine online